Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3537 HB 412 Representative Brown placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The following members moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest: Representative Willis Representative James Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 18, line 36: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 8,815,900 Insert 9,270,400 Under General Fund: Delete 1,502,600 Insert 1,832,100" Under Other Funds: Delete 7,313,300 Insert 7,438,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3538 HB 412 Page 19, following line 7: Insert Federal Student Aid Under Allocations: Insert 454,500 Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 14, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 12,100,100 Insert 12,959,500 Under General Fund: Delete 7,100,100 Insert 7,959,500 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3539 HB 412 Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Barnes, Bunde, Ivan, Masek And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 35, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 19,326,100 Insert 18,376,100 Under General Fund: Delete 19,191,900 Insert 18,241,900 Page 35, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete 3,729,300 Insert 2,779,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3540 HB 412 Page 22, line 3: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 197,296,500 Insert 198,246,500 Under General Fund: Delete 99,075,100 Insert 100,025,100 Page 22, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete 44,008,200 Insert 44,958,200 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, Amendment No. 5 was divided. Part A of Amendment No. 5: Page 35, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 19,326,100 Insert 18,376,100 Under General Fund: Delete 19,191,900 Insert 18,241,900 Page 35, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete 3,729,300 Insert 2,779,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3541 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5, Part A be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5, Part A YEAS: 3 NAYS: 32 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Brice, Elton, Grussendorf Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brown, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: B.Davis Absent: Finkelstein, Kelly, Martin, Moses And so, Amendment No. 5, Part A was not adopted. Part B of Amendment No. 5: Page 22, line 3: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 197,296,500 Insert 198,246,500 Under General Fund: Delete 99,075,100 Insert 100,025,100 Page 22, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete 44,008,200 Insert 44,958,200 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5, Part B be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3542 HB 412 CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5, Part B YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 5, Part B was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Nicholia: Page 21, line 5: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 2,751,100 Insert 2,901,100 Under General Fund: Delete 1,144,400 Insert 1,294,400 Page 21, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete 1,401,900 Insert 1,551,900 Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Masek objected. 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3543 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 17, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 951,300 Insert 1,442,600 Under General Fund: Delete 442,300 Insert 752,300 Under Other Funds: Delete 509,000 Insert 690,300 Page 18, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 763,000 Insert 1,254,300 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3544 HB 412 Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3545 HB 412 Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 42,281,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,744,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,537,600 Page 22, line 33: Under Allocations: Delete 5,828,500 Insert 8,332,500 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. There being no objection, Amendment No. 8 was divided. Part A of Amendment No. 8: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,816,100 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3546 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8, Part A be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8, Part A YEAS: 6 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Elton, Finkelstein, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: James, Martin, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 8, Part A was not adopted. Part B of Amendment No. 8: Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 42,281,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,744,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,537,600 Page 22, line 33: Allocations: Delete 5,828,500 Insert 8,332,500 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3547 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8, Part B be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8, Part B YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: James, Martin, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 8, Part B was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 41,987,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,597,100 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3548 HB 412 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,390,600 Page 22, line 34: Under Allocations: Delete 6,788,600 Insert 8,998,600 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled that the question was divisible. There being no objection, Amendment No. 9 was divided. Part A of Amendment No. 9: Page 35, line 35: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 Under General Fund: Delete 5,068,100 Insert 3,963,100 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9, Part A be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9, Part A YEAS: 5 NAYS: 33 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3549 HB 412 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Elton, Finkelstein, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 9, Part A was not adopted. Part B of Amendment No. 9: Page 22, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 39,777,700 Insert 41,987,700 Under General Fund: Delete 19,492,100 Insert 20,597,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 20,285,600 Insert 21,390,600 Page 22, line 34: Under Allocations: Delete 6,788,600 Insert 8,998,600 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9, Part B be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3550 HB 412 CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9, Part B YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: B.Davis Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 9, Part B was not adopted.